Psychological thrillers, literary mysteries, and philosophical fiction exploring identity, belief, guilt, and the limits of truth.
Understanding isn't the same as knowing.
Featured Novel
A psychological thriller, literary mystery, and philosophical suspense novel.
Dr. Steven Gold has built his life on understanding—of his patients, of the mind, of himself. But when a new patient enters his office, that certainty begins to fracture.
Then, with quiet conviction, he makes an impossible claim: he is Satan.
What begins as a test of clinical skill becomes something far more dangerous. As their sessions deepen, contradictions emerge, reality begins to blur, and a sudden death draws Gold into an investigation that seems to point back to his own office.
As the boundaries between patient and self begin to collapse, Gold is forced to confront a possibility more unsettling than madness: that the truths he has spent a lifetime explaining may not be truths at all.
Genres: Psychological Thriller • Literary Mystery • Philosophical Suspense
Exploring: Identity, belief, guilt, morality, free will, consciousness, religion, and the nature of truth.
Before the questions of belief and identity that shape his later life, a young psychologist is drawn into a series of murders that may—or may not—be connected. As he searches for truth and understanding, he begins to confront a difficult reality: understanding isn't the same as knowing, and some answers only deepen the mystery they were meant to resolve.
Projected completion: 2027.
A man can no longer trust the boundary of his own mind. Memory, fear, and imagination bleed into one another, until even his thoughts may not be his own. As certainty dissolves, he is forced to confront a terrifying question: if nothing can be trusted, what remains?
Projected completion: 2027.
Short reflections on identity, guilt, belief, style, and the uneasy space between understanding and knowing.
Use this form to send a message to David Sherman.
I listen to a wide variety of music while writing, reading, and revising. These are a few of the playlists I return to most often—different kinds of accompaniment for different kinds of thought.
Much of my work begins as fragments—notes jotted down throughout the day and night, often without clear connection. Music helps me return to them, to sit with them long enough for patterns to emerge and for something more coherent to take shape—though not always to resolve.
It also helps quiet the background noise of life when I’m trying to concentrate. I don’t use it as background so much as a way of sustaining attention—holding a space in which ideas can be revisited, tested, and, at times, transformed.
Jazz as thought. Piano trios and modern jazz shaped by tension rather than resolution—music that moves without settling, allowing thought to deepen without distraction. For revision where meaning is uncertain, identity unstable, and answers arrive, if at all, indirectly. Post-bop / ECM / avant-garde- Space, tension, introspection.
Classical as feeling. Quiet enough to reveal what’s there, structured enough to keep the mind from drifting. It doesn’t lead, but it doesn’t disappear either—sitting just beneath language, where meaning sharpens and subtle inconsistencies begin to emerge. Neo-classical / romantic minimalism- Emotion, reflection, atmosphere
Jazz as movement. A broader, more changeable field of sound—less narrowly tuned to a single mood, but equally suited to long stretches of concentration. For work that benefits from openness, variation, and the occasional shift in tone. Hard bop / bebop - Groove, swing, propulsion.
